Two posts ago Ming posed the rhetorical question," Did Ming ever tell you about that half eaten taco he found in that dumpster that looked just like Mitch?" Since he already ate it, you'll just have to accept Ming's word on that. However, sitting here knitting antimacassars waiting for Investor Village to get well, Ming ruminated on that sentence, which he now sheepishly realizes needs clarification. It's not that Mitch looks like a dumpster but rather like a half eaten taco. Ming can only hope this clarification is published in time to preclude Mitch from having recourse to the Courts so as to sue the impecunious Ming for defamation. Did Ming mention he is impecunious and thus judgment proof? Good. A word to the litigious is sufficient.
Sep 3, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment